Mercury Bugs - mercury | |||||
| View Issue Details | |||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
| 0000448 | mercury | Bug | public | 2018-02-07 05:30 | 2018-02-07 05:30 |
| Reporter | zs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assigned To | zs | ||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | assigned | Resolution | open | ||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | |||
| Product Version | |||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||
| Summary | 0000448: singleton warning generation ignores variables in quantifications | ||||
| Description | The problem is that quantification replaces the list of variables being quantified by a scope, ostensibly because that information is not needed by later compiler passes. However, it *is* needed by the code that generates warnings for singleton predicates. As it is, we get bad singleton warnings for code such as some [X] ( ... X ... ) and may NOT get singleton warnings for code such as some [X] ( ... code in which there is no variable named X ... ) | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | The two halves of the problem are demonstrated by the test cases valid/bad_singleton_warning.m and warnings/missing_singleton_warning.m, which I just added to the repository. | ||||
| Additional Information | Simply keeping the quantified variables in place causes problems for later passes; it is such code in these later passes that are the actual bugs. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Relationships | |||||
| Attached Files | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Issue History | |||||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-07 05:30 | zs | New Issue | |||
| 2018-02-07 05:30 | zs | Status | new => assigned | ||
| 2018-02-07 05:30 | zs | Assigned To | => zs | ||