| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0000192 | mercury | Bug | public | 2011-03-23 06:17 | 2011-03-23 06:17 | ||||||||
| Reporter | colanderman | ||||||||||||
| Assigned To | |||||||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A | ||||||||
| Status | new | Resolution | open | ||||||||||
| Product Version | |||||||||||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||||||
| Summary | 0000192: State variable record notation enhancement | ||||||||||||
| Description | With the coming changes to the library to better support state variable use, I believe that the following notation would be useful: foo(..., !X ^ bar) would be equivalent to: foo(..., !.X ^ bar, X_bar), !X ^ bar := X_bar Multiple uses of this notation within one predicate call should probably be disallowed. | ||||||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||||||
| Attached Files |
| ||||||||||||
 Relationships |
|
 Relationships |
| Notes |
|
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Notes |
| Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-03-23 06:17 | colanderman | New Issue | |
| Issue History |